Remember the old story of the tortoise and the hare? Aesop’s
old fable about a race between the extremely fast hare and the slow tortoise is
a famous one, appearing in countless children’s books. It also made its
appearance on Rocky and Bullwinkle and The Bugs Bunny Show. In
the latter case, the role of the hare was played by no less a personage than
Bugs Bunny himself, which is almost, but not completely, totally unlike getting
Sir Lawrence Olivier to appear in a high school production of Hamlet.
The fact is, though, the story has tremendous longevity.
This little race fable has, as it were, “legs.” If there is one thing that
story tortoise, it’s that speed simply isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. Indeed,
one of the fastest people I’ve ever met was a 75 year old Judo master. He never
seemed to move all that much, but no matter how fast we tried to hit him,
somehow we always hit the ground instead. His secret, he told us, was that we
simply had to be in the right place at the right time. As long as we could do
that, we didn’t have to move very fast.
This same question of speed plays into how we experience
time and, by extension, how productive we are. When we feel that we don’t have
much time, we try to move faster. This is tiring: the hare, as you’ll recall, fell
asleep before the end of the race. Not only that, and odd as it may sound, the
faster we move, the less time we feel like we have. In a shocking counterpoint
to Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, which says that the faster we go the more
time slows down, when we go fast, time seems to speed up as well. My physicist
friends assure me, however, that this would change if I could simply move at a
rate approaching the speed of light. Failing that, we need to learn to
experience time differently, and use time in ways that maximize our
productivity without leaving us exhausted.
Fortunately, there are ways to do this. Instead of viewing
time as ticks on a clock or blocks on a calendar, we need to step back from
that rigid construction of time and instead view time for what it actually is:
Nature’s way of making sure everything doesn’t happen all at once. Time imposes
a sequence on our activities, and it does that no matter how much we may wish
otherwise. That sequence, however, can be used to our advantage. Instead of
being locked into a rigid, clock-based image of time, we can instead view time
as a series of events. Each event triggers the next event. What does this mean?
When we are locked into a clock-based view of time, we
attempt to start and stop activities according to the number on the clock: 3pm
have pre-meeting meeting, 3:30pm meeting, 7pm post meeting discussion, and so
on. When we are working with others and need to coordinate a variety of
different people, use of space, and allocation of other resources, then we need
to impose some of that clock based ordering. Too much of it though just slows
us down: if something takes longer, or shorter, than expected, suddenly the
whole schedule is thrown off. We get distracted and suddenly find ourselves
running behind or forget to take breaks and wear ourselves out too soon.
Instead, within our blocks of time, and whenever we are
working in a relatively unstructured environment, we need to think in terms of
events. What events are happening around us? What events are we causing? Our
events can be used to trigger us to change activities or take breaks. In one
office, the coffee cart coming around was the trigger for people to take a
break and move to a different task. An engineer working at home used the school
bus driving by in the morning and mail deliveries in the afternoon as events to
trigger him to switch tasks. We can even take this a step further, and create
explicit linkages of events for our own uses: when I finish testing this piece
of code, I will make a cup of coffee. When I finish my coffee I will review the
documentation. When I finish… and so on.
When we plan and connect events this way, it’s amazing how much time we
don’t waste just trying to decide what to do next.
The other piece of managing our perception of time is to
create a schedule that we can beat. It’s quite amazing: when we’re ahead of
schedule, we are simultaneously more relaxed and more energized. We focus
better and come up with more creative solutions to problems. Unexpected
obstacles are fun challenges. When we are behind schedule, we feel rushed.
Every delay feels like a crisis. We take shortcuts and make more mistakes.
Ultimately, teams that are ahead end up further ahead. Teams
that are behind, end up further behind. People who are rushed don’t see what is
in front of them, lose track of where they are, and exhaust themselves too
soon. If you want to win, design a schedule that you can beat not one that
beats you.
I have three cats. Cats being the creatures that they are, I have only to sit down to read a book and instantly there is a cat on my lap. Regardless of which cat it is, a familiar pattern ensues: first, the cat carefully positions itself in front of my book. Once I adjust to move the book, the cat then carefully positions itself on one of my hands. This continues until I give the cat the attention it’s seeking. At that point, it first butts its head against me and then, purring loudly, turns and sticks its behind in my face.
I am sure that there are people who find this end of a cat absolutely fascinating. I’m even quite sure that there are contests in which cats win awards for having the most beautiful behind. For cat breeders and cat fanciers, it can be a big deal to win one of these cat trophies. It is a cause for great celebration.
In an office environment, however, a catastrophe is anything but a cause for celebration.
The worst thing about catastrophes is that they happen about as often as a cat sitting down on top of the book you’re reading. At least, to listen to some managers, it certainly sounds that way. Somehow, every little thing, every small problem, was magnified until it had the aura of impending doom. In short, every setback was becoming a prize for the cat with the most beautiful behind. At one company, the conversation went something like this:
“We’ve found a major bug in the software.”
“We can’t delay the ship.”
“We can’t ship with this bug.”
At that point, the manager started screaming that the product would go out on schedule, or else. When he finally calmed down and I was able to talk with him privately, he told me that he knew that if the company didn’t ship on time, the customers would abandon them and they would go out of business. He was happy to ship non-functional software to avoid that fate.
When he calmed down still further, he agreed to delay the ship.
I am sure that most readers are chuckling to themselves right now. After all, delays in software are legendary. Obviously, this manager was overreacting. True enough; the question is, why? Why would a perfectly sensible, intelligent man react so negatively to something which is, frankly, a common event in the software business?
It turns out that this particular company prided itself on holding to very aggressive schedules. The schedule was so aggressive that they were virtually always running behind. Therein lay the problem.
Time is a funny thing. We react very differently depending on how we perceive it. Being behind schedule all the time had the effect of generating a certain sense of urgency, which was the stated intent of the aggressive schedule. Unfortunately, the urgency generated in this situation was of the slightly breathless, heart-pounding sort similar to what one might experience if being chased by a very large cat of the “has a big mane” variety. A cat which, I might add, is looking to do more than just sit on your book.
The problem with aggressive schedules is that, in fact, being behind schedule can generate the same panicked response in people that they would feel in a situation which actually was dangerous. While in those situations, we’re very good at running away or fighting desperately, but we’re not good at making cool, rational decisions or developing innovative solutions to problems. Each pebble encountered along the road becomes a giant boulder. When we do finally get to the end of the project, rather than feeling a sense of accomplishment and success, there’s more of a sense of relief that at last it’s over. What’s missing is the thrill of victory that energizes people for the next project. That feeling of success is the key to getting, and keeping, people excited and motivated.
In short, instead of the team beating the schedule, the schedule was beating them.
Conversely, when a team is running slightly ahead of schedule, something very different happens. Running ahead of the game means that the team is feeling a constant sense of success. When people feel successful, they work harder, they are more creative, and they look forward to coming into work each day. Teams that are running ahead of schedule are more likely to develop innovative new solutions to problems rather than just slap on band-aids. Feeling that you have the time to stop and think is critical: just think about how easy it is to miss the obvious when you are feeling rushed.
The trick is to view your schedule as a living document. It’s something that you will constantly adjust according to the situation, especially at the beginning of a project. The less you know about potential difficulties down the road, the harder it is to plan: so don’t. Instead, plan to plan. As you move forward, you can revise and project the schedule further and further into the future.
If you find yourself running behind, that’s feedback. Pay attention to what it’s telling you. Is something more complicated than expected? Is someone overwhelmed with a task that turned out to be significantly more time-consuming than you thought? Did something go wrong? Is a vendor habitually late with parts? Is your schedule just plain too aggressive?
If you’re running ahead, that’s also feedback. It might mean that the schedule is too easy and your team isn’t being challenged. Be willing to become more aggressive. It could mean that you need to slow down: are people rushing and cutting corners? At one company, pressure on QA engineers to rush product inspections led to some very expensive and embarrassing recalls and some very irate customers. Moving way ahead of schedule could also mean that your team is working too hard too soon: success is a marathon, not a sprint. Burn out early and you won’t reach the finish line.
Leave the catastrophes to the cats.
Stephen Balzac is an expert on leadership and organizational development. A consultant, author, and professional speaker, he is president of 7 Steps Ahead, an organizational development firm focused on helping businesses get unstuck. Steve is the author of “The McGraw-Hill 36-Hour Course in Organizational Development,” and “Organizational Psychology for Managers.” He is also a contributing author to volume one of “Ethics and Game Design: Teaching Values Through Play.” For more information, or to sign up for Steve’s monthly newsletter, visit www.7stepsahead.com. You can also contact Steve at 978-298-5189 or steve@7stepsahead.com.
December 15th,2015
Newsletters,
Published Articles,
Thoughts on business | tags:
catastrophe,
cats,
fear,
goal setting,
goals,
motivation,
productivity,
schedules,
stress,
time management |
Comments Off on Of Cats and Unwanted Prizes
It’s snowing as I write this. Of course, these days that means I could be writing this article almost anytime. In the last three weeks, we’ve had some 7 feet of snow, or maybe 8, in the Boston area. That makes for a lot of snowmen! It also makes for a lot of slush in people’s schedules. It’s no wonder that the police in one New Hampshire town issued an arrest warrant for Punxsutawney Phil.
In fact, this sort of weather really makes a dramatic point about just how hard it can be to plan and schedule just about anything. A couple of blizzards and it’s amazing how disrupted everything becomes.
Schedules are a funny thing. When I was giving a workshop a few years ago on project management, one of the people in the audience became quite irate when I suggested that the point of a schedule is not to make sure that you optimize every minute, but rather that a schedule exists to prevent us from trying to do everything all at once.
This person insisted that it was possible to precisely calculate the amount of time that each step of the schedule would take and thus there was no need to waste any time. Had this actually worked for him? Well, it turns out that he was (in)famous for missing deadlines and burning out his teams trying to hit arbitrary targets. No matter how precisely he tried to calculate the schedule, something would always derail it: the flu has no respect for precision. Once a tight schedule is disrupted, it can easily become a game of falling dominos.
In the end, the goal is to beat the schedule, not create a schedule that beats you. It’s quite amazing: when we’re ahead of schedule, we are simultaneously more relaxed and more energized. We focus better and come up with more creative solutions to problems. Unexpected obstacles are fun challenges. When we are behind schedule, we feel rushed. Every delay feels like a crisis. We take shortcuts and make more mistakes, which, in turn, only further disrupts the schedule.
The secret, it turns out, to effective schedules is not to try to be extremely precise, but rather to recognize that your schedule will need some slush. Things do not always happen when they are supposed to: some things will go faster than expected, and others will go more slowly. The goal is to be able to adapt to that: when the US military started conducting war games with the Japanese, the hardest thing for the Japanese military was that US forces wouldn’t attack on time. Sometimes they were early, sometimes they were late. This was very frustrating for the Japanese, who were used to extreme precision in their war games. Eventually, they figured out the lesson: warfare doesn’t happen on a clock.
When you’re building your schedule, don’t just estimate how long something will take. Break down each task, think about the different moving pieces involved. Consider which pieces can be disrupted by someone getting the flu or by a freak storm. Where are you implementing a known and tested solution and where are you trying something new and different? Exploration will always take longer if only because you don’t know ahead of time what you’re getting into: Boston’s famous Big Dig certainly had its share of bad planning, but it also had its share of discovering that the problems being solved were much bigger and more difficult than anyone expected.
As I explained to someone very recently, always put breaks in the schedule. As every endurance athlete learns, mostly by ignoring this advice, you need to stop and rest periodically. When you decide to skip a rest or a meal break, you set yourself up for failure. Just as the silence between the notes is what makes the music, it is the breaks in the schedule that enable the team to maintain high productivity over the long term.
Take time in your schedule as well to put in checkpoints to evaluate progress. That doesn’t mean fighting about why something didn’t get done, but rather to understand what is working and what is not. Make adjustments and shift resources as necessary: part of good scheduling is the ongoing process of refining the schedule.
But what about 8 feet of snow? Surely no one can plan for weather conditions like that! Of course not, but that’s not the point. When we are used to the idea that schedules need regular tune-ups and adjustments, when we recognize that unexpected obstacles are just part of the job, then it becomes easier to role with whatever storms arise. The blizzard isn’t a crisis, it’s just a more dramatic version of business as usual.
Are you beating the schedule or is the schedule beating you?